Robot assisted stroke rehabilitation and the research funding crisis

Posted in News, Blog

Robot assisted stroke rehabilitation and the research funding crisis

I, Rob-OT, does not compute: the rise of the machine in post-stroke occupational therapy and the funding power-cut causing it to malfunction.

Exploration? Investigation? Call it what you will, but occupational therapy research is as boundless as the profession itself and no less when it comes to robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation.

Yet researchers globally are in a funding crisis currently, caused largely by a shift in public donating towards covid-linked causes.

In response, and for the first time, the Stroke Association this year switched out its annual Make May Purple stroke awareness campaign for a ‘Save Research’ appeal, recognising the intrinsic value of evidence ineffective healthcare provision. 

The UK charity has been forced to halve its 2021 research budget due to the drop in donations despite 1 in 5 researchers reporting extra funding needs due to the pandemic’s impact. [1]

So, to help highlight why research funding is so vital, we’ve carried out a small survey ourselves of some of the latest occupational therapy discoveries driving robot-assisted stroke rehab:


Racing robots

Opportunities to set robots against humans in rehabilitation races are proving too much to pass up for researchers worldwide – and with good reason.

Evidence of the benefits of robot-assisted therapy is growing.

The latest issue of Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation provides more of it, based on a trial by occupational therapy researchers at China’s Xuzhou Medical University. 

The team wanted to find out whether robotic assistance in post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation:


  • Benefitted occupational therapy sessions, such as reducing method monotony and therapist-patient exhaustion.
  • Boosted quality of life in terms of independence.
  • Enhanced upper limb function training.


The machine contender was a robotic, height-adjustable workstation with four upper limb rehab modes: passive, assistive, active and resistive.

Over six weeks, 50 stroke patients, divided into two teams led by occupational therapists (OTs) or robot-assisted OTs, were trained for 50 to 70 minutes a day, five days a week.

And, encouragingly, team rob-OT won ‘the race’, with better results including ‘significant improvements in upper limb function. [2]


   The soft robot helped open their paralyzed finger joints by more than 50 degrees on average. [3]   


Gripping stuff

Researchers in Korea have been getting a grip on reinforcing finger strength and motor skills in post-stroke patients.

A team at Handong Global University in Pohang have developed a wearable ‘soft robot’ for stroke patients with finger joint paralysis on one side of their body. 

Incorporated in gloves, the robot measures the finger positions of the unaffected hand and triggers symmetric movements on the paralysed hand using pneumatic force.

And when ten patients were enlisted to trial the gloves during occupational therapy sessions, there were high fives all round.

“The soft robot helped open their paralyzed finger joints by more than 50 degrees on average,” the team reported.

It also provided quantitative data about a patient’s finger paralysis that could not be detected via the usual qualitative assessments. [3]


   There is a need to look beyond the ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, where a single [upper extremity] modality is applied to a group of post-stroke individuals. [4]   


Fish and grips

SUPERresearchers in Canada sent chronic stroke patients on a virtual fishing trip to land answers about whether robot assistance improved their upper extremity function.

The 28 trial participants received a dozen one-hour sessions over four weeks operSonalisedUpper Extremity Rehabilitation (SUPER)combining robotics, virtual reality (VR) activities and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). 

The robot-assisted activity was a virtual underwater fishing game that encouraged the player to test their maximal voluntary arm extension.

The VR session was based on a grocery shopping task and included 30-minutes of NMES.

When the trial ended, around two-thirdsof those who took part had improved upper extremity functionprompting plans for future SUPER studies, along with a recommendation for more varied therapy options.[4]


   The routine use of evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation interventions after stroke has the potential to improve function and increase independence. [5]   


Scot bot barriers

It’s all very well developing robot-assisted devices to enhance stroke rehab, but what if stroke survivors don’t want to use them?

Lanarkshire OT Gillian Sweeney was among a research team trying to answer that crucial question amid low uptake of robot-aided interventions among NHS Scotland’s clinical practices.

Cross-sectional online surveys of OTs’ opinions and semi-structured interviews with stroke patients were carried out.

And the recurring reasons recorded included:


  • Inadequate staffing.
  • Lack of training and resources.
  • Patient motivation. 


The study, published in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy, concludes with a call for further research into the impact of patient motivation on intervention uptake. [5]


   Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injuries, such as stroke. [6]   



Swiss rehabilitation researchers and members of Zurich’s Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems enrolled 33 stroke survivors in a head-to-head between neurocognitive therapy for hand function and a robot-assisted alternative.

The goal was to work out whether the robot-assisted therapy - provided after a neurocognitive combo of motor training and somatosensory and cognitive tasks - decreased upper limb motor impairment to the same degree as conventional neurocognitive therapy.

And the results, recorded at the end of intervention at week 8 and again at week 32, established that motor recovery in the robot-aided group was non-inferior to (or, no worse than) that achieved by conventional therapy. [6]



For more on robots in healthcare, ICRADRRWR 2021 is the place to be this month!

Despite the pandemic and an acronym sounding like a malfunctioning text to speech converter, the 2021 International Conference on Robotic Assistive Devices, Rehabilitation Robots and Wheelchair Robots (ICRADRRWR) will be fully up and running – but digitally.

The two-day event showcases the latest research, innovations, trends, challenges, and solutions in the three fields and plays host to leading scientists, researchers, and scholars worldwide. [7]


Related Articles

Waltz with us on world stroke day.

The lived experiences of stroke survivors.

Brain awareness week - our amazing brain and neurological research

Rehabilitation as a vehicle for change is driving occupational therapy to the healthcare frontline

Neurolifenow reveals the latest lived experiences of neurorehabilitation during the covid pandemic

The latest from talking heads ...

What’s on in June 2021? Occupational therapy, brain injury and neurorehabilitation events
We’ve rounded up some of the main events on offer this month for anyone interested in occupational therapy, brain injury and neurorehabilitation – as a service provider or user!  

Astronauts and neuro occupational therapy: It's action for brain injury week 2021

Blasting through black holes of isolation for brain injury survivors in Action for Brain Injury Week 2021.
Mental Health Awareness Week 2021: nature-based interventions for brain injury and mental well-being.
Are we digging nature-based neurorehabilitation? In Mental Health Awareness Week, we get to the grassroots of ecotherapy and its blossoming outcomes for brain injury survivors. 

Occupational therapy in prisons - the battle to help brain injured people behind bars.

Brain injury within the UK’s criminal justice system is up to five times higher than in the general population – a shocking disparity that leaves countless questions begging.



[2]  Chinembiri, B. et al, “The fourier M2 robotic machine combined with occupational therapy on post-stroke upper limb function and independence-related quality of life: A randomized clinical trial,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation , vol. 28, no. 1, 2021. 

[3]  Kim, J. et al, “A Wearable Soft Robot for Stroke Patients’ Finger Occupational Therapy and Quantitative Measures on the Joint Paralysis,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, December 2020. 

[4]  Norouzi-Gheidari, N. et al, “Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a combined virtual reality, robotics and electrical stimulation intervention in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2021. 

[5]  Sweeney, G. et al, “Exploration of barriers and enablers for evidence-based interventions for upper limb rehabilitation following a stroke: Use of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Robot Assisted Therapy in NHS Scotland,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 83, no. 11, 2020. 

[6]  Ranzani, R. et al, “Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2020. 



Subscribe to our mailing list

We promise not to bombard you with too much information!

Speak to an expert

Call today on 01722 466117